15, 1425/ October 30, 2004 #107
SCROLL DOWN TO
October 29: Hundreds of Kashmiris came out to protest in Srinagar
[occupied Kashmir] after
soldiers and Central Reserve policemen held and gang-raped a
20 year old Kashmiri woman who was travelling from Jammu to Sopore.
She was held in a government "guest house" in Srinagar and victimized
all night. [Source: daily
4th Essay on Election 2004
Muslim Vote for Kerry and the Theory of the "Lesser Evil"
Kaukab Siddique, Ph.D
Is there any Justification for it in
[The first three essays were on :
October 30. It's almost election time. The self-appointed "leaders" of
Muslims of America
have not come up with even verse from the
which would justify participation in the oppressive power structure
through elections or otherwise. There can be little doubt that the
so-called leaders, be they in
or W.D. Muhammad have abandoned the Qur'an and the Hadith as sources
of Guidance in political issues. These are secularized groups using
the name of Islam and are often weighted down with barely hidden
nationalism, classism and genderism emanating from the values of
Boycott of Elections.
If Muslims Don't Vote, will they be Ineffective?
CAIR or SCARE? The American People are not our Enemies.]
Those who taught from the Qur'an and the Hadith, the real leaders of
America's Muslims are in prison:
Imam Jamil al-Amin,
Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman,
Siddique Abdullah Hasan and others.
Independent Imams like Imam Warithuddin Omar, Imam Musa,
Imam Muhammad al-'Asi and others, as far as we know, have not
endorsed ISNA-ICNA-CAIR-WD pro-power structure moves.
At the lower levels of the "invite me to the White House, please"
groups are some "Islam leaning" individuals" who claim that voting
for Kerry is the lesser of two evils. The question arises: Does Islam,
in any shape and form, endorse the theory that Muslims should support
the lesser of two evils?
The Qur'an and the Hadith are very clear. Islam supports GOOD. It does
not support EVIL whether it is lesser or greater. The entire life of
the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) bears witness that for a Muslim, the only
option is good, not lesser or greater evil. He opposed both Abu Jahal
[who was vehement in his transgression, like
and Abu Sufian [who was more diplomatic, like Kerry].
The Qur'an says:
"The believers, men and women, are protectors and guardians of each
other. They command what is clearly JUST, and forbid what is EVIL:
They establish prayer, pay zakat and obey Allah and His messenger. On
them will Allah pour His mercy, for Allah is exalted in power,
The Arabic word for evil, MUNKAR, encompasses all forms of evil, whether
it is personal or economic or political. Nowhere in the Qur'an does one
get the idea that "lesser evil" is acceptable.
In fact the Prophet (pbuh) was offered lesser evil and rejected it. In
the chiefs of the Quraish implored him to desist from attacking their
idols and they would give him whatever he wanted, be it wealth, women
or power. They were willing to let him pray to "his" God as long as
he did not oppose their power structure, their idols, their system
of slavery and the subjugation of women, the weak, the oppressed.
The Prophet (pbuh) rejected the offer out of hand without the slightest
hesitation. [For various offers by the Quraish chiefs to Muhammad, pbuh,
see Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishaq, the earliest extant biography of the
In Islam, there is no substitute for a JUST struggle focused on goodness,
virtue, chastity, truthfulness, and fearlessness. All the difficulties
of this way must be endured for the sake of final victory.
[Notice how Imam Jamil does not compromise although he is pressured
and humiliated in solitary confinement! He is 100% with the SUNNAH.
Notice Dr. Omar 'Abdel Rahman, BLIND, UNABLE TO SPEAK ENGLISH, ailing,
just about buried alive by his
captors. Does he compromise? No. He is 100% with the SUNNAH .]
So what is the cause of ISNA-ICNA-CAIR-WD's claim of the lesser evil,
be it Kerry [or even more ridiculous, Nader]? There is nothing in
Islam for them. It is true that the Qur'an heartened the Muslims
by referring to the victory of the Christians [Romans] over the
Persians, but the Qur'an did not imply in any way that the Muslims
should JOIN either side. In fact, when the time came, the forces of
Islam faced both empires and toppled them. JOINING THE LESSER EVIL
has NEVER BEEN an ISLAMIC OPTION. The Qur'an gives only one option:
" By the Declining Day: Surely humankind is in loss, except such as
have Faith and do good works, and join together in teaching the Truth ,
and join together in patient Perseverence."
STOP THESE ACTIVITIES WHICH UNDERMINE THE ISLAMIC COMMUNITY:
[HERE IS THE ALTERNATIVE IDEA.]
ISNA-ICNA-CAIR-WD have made it a part of their program to invite
non-Muslim politicians and leaders to speak to Muslim communities.
The result can be described as REVERSE Da'WAH. That is, we are
subjecting our often fragile and weak communities to the idea that
these non-Muslims are our friends even though they recognize
and we don't. The prayers and fasting of many Muslim congregations
are disrupted by the presence and self-praise of these opportunistic
activities of non-Muslim leaders.
If these "self-appointed" leaders of Muslims were capable of Islamic
thought, they would send Muslim scholars, committed to the cause of
Allah to speak in non-Muslim communities, and not the reverse. Already
OUR CHILDREN are subjected every day to the propaganda of the subtle
and not-so-subtle enemies of Islam, on a daily basis. Then the final
sanctuary of the Muslims, the mosque, is invaded by non-Muslim
politicians so that the self-appointed Muslim
"leaders" can win some brownie points from their masters.
If this idea of "lesser evil" is allowed to flourish, our communities
will be (and are being) initiated into "a LITTLE Haram," a "FEW" drinks,
a little nudity, a little sex, only a few SPECKS of lard, and then into
The Islamic way is quite different:
"...Those who patiently persevere, seeking the countenance of their Lord,
establish regular prayers, spend out of the what We have bestowed for
their sustenance, secretly and openly: and turn off Evil with GOOD:
for such there is the final attainment of the (Eternal) Home ..." [13:22]
Study: 100,000 Excess Civilian
Deaths Since War
Thu Oct 28, 2:57 PM ET
By Patricia Reaney
- Tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed in violence since the
invasion last year, American public health experts have calculated in
a report that estimates there were 100,000 "excess deaths" in 18 months.
The rise in the death rate was mainly due to violence and much of it
was caused by U.S. air strikes on towns and cities.
"Making conservative assumptions, we think that about 100,000 excess
deaths, or more have happened since the 2003 invasion of Iraq (news -
web sites)," said Les Roberts of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health in a report published online by The Lancet medical journal.
"The use of air power in areas with lots of civilians appears to be
killing a lot of women and children," Roberts told Reuters.
The report came just days before the U.S. presidential election in
which the Iraq war has been a major issue.
Mortality was already high in Iraq before the war because of
United Nations sanctions blocking food and medical imports but
the researchers described what they found as shocking.
The new figures are based on surveys done by the researchers in Iraq
in September 2004. They compared Iraqi deaths during 14.6 months before
the invasion in March 2003 and the 17.8 months after it by conducting
household surveys in randomly selected neighborhoods.
Previous estimates based on think tank and media sources put the
Iraqi civilian death toll at up to 16,053 and military fatalities as
high as 6,370.
By comparison about 849 U.S. military were killed in combat or attacks
and another 258 died in accidents or incidents not related to fighting,
according to the Pentagon (news - web sites).
VERY BAD FOR IRAQI CIVILIANS
The researchers blamed air strikes for many of the deaths.
"What we have evidence of is the use of air power in populated urban
areas and the bad consequences of it," Roberts said.
Gilbert Burnham, who collaborated on the research, said U.S. military
action in Iraq was "very bad for Iraqi civilians."
"We were not expecting the level of deaths from violence that we found
in this study and we hope this will lead to some serious discussions
of how military and political aims can be achieved in a way that is not
so detrimental to civilians populations," he told Reuters in an interview.
The researchers did 33 cluster surveys of 30 households each, recording
the date, circumstances and cause of deaths.
They found that the risk of death from violence in the period after
the invasion was 58 times higher than before the war.
Before the war the major causes of death were heart attacks,
chronic disorders and accidents. That changed after the war.
Two-thirds of violent deaths in the study were reported in Falluja,
the insurgent held city 50 km (32 miles) west of Baghdad which had been
repeatedly hit by U.S. air strikes.
"Our results need further verification and should lead to changes
to reduce non-combatant deaths from air strikes," Roberts added in
Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, said the research which was
submitted to the journal earlier this month had been peer-reviewed,
edited and fast-tracked for publication because of its importance in
the evolving security situation in Iraq.
"But these findings also raise questions for those far removed from
Iraq -- in the governments of the countries responsible for launching
a pre-emptive war," Horton said in an editorial.
OSAMA: HEALTHY, CALM, TALL, CHALLENGES AMERICA:
If you don't attack us, we won't attack you.
October 29 was full of drama. Two important news appeared: John Kerry
came out with UNQUALIFIED SUPPORT for Israel. Totally ignoring the
month long slaughter of
Kerry echoed Bush with the words: Israel has the right to defend itself.
Then came the report of Osama's video. Both Kerry and Bush went
ballistic, threatening to destroy the terrorists by any means necessary.
The video is quite a blow for the conspiracy theorists: All those
stories that: He has already been captured and will be brought to
light just before the elections, that he is dead, that he is a
fiction created by the Pentagon, that
was done by "you know who," Muslims don't know how to fly planes, etc.,
no plane hit the Pentagon, etc, etc.
Osama looked calm, healthy [though ascetic], tall as ever. Both his
hands seem to be okay. He made no threats. Instead he offered a form
of peace: "If you don't attack us, we won't attack you."
He indicated that Israel's genocide of Muslims is central to his vision;
that he first became politicized by the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in
1982. PALESTINE's FREEDOM is his cherished goal.
He took responsibility for 9.11.
For Americans, this makes him a "barbarian" in Kerry's words. By
contrast, a scientific non-propagandist report from the LANCET magazine
which estimates that 100,000 Iraqis, mostly WOMEN and CHILDREN, have
been killed in U.S. air strikes in Iraq since March 2003, hardly caused
a ripple in U.S.
stands by its earlier analysis that the 9.11 attack unit led by
Mohammed Atta was autonomous. Osama is taking credit for it but could
not possibly have directly organized it.]
WHAT IMPACT WILL OSAMA's VIDEO HAVE? There is a good chance that it
will stir up America's power structure and elites. There is great
anger already expressed by both parties. Bush is seen as stronger
on terrorism than Kerry, so the video could give Bush the slight edge
Osama might have decided to get Bush re-elected. If the book
IMPERIAL HUBRIS is to be believed, Osama wants to take on the U.S.
by making the U.S. fight the entire Muslim world, which Bush is
quite eager to do.
If Kerry gets elected, the wars will continue. If Bush is elected,
the wars will be extended to other countries.
Osama is recognized even in U.S. polling experiments as the leader of
the entire Islamic world [with the exception of
However, the Muslims who have actually joined him with weapons are said
to number only in thousands, perhaps tens of thousands.
If Osama's video gets Bush re-elected, the war will become very open
globally: Islam vs America. Osama is probably trying that Muslim
youths should join him, not in tens of thousands, as now, but in
millions. To reach that objective, he needs Bush to be re-elected
and to send out more American troops to Muslim lands.
click here to email
a link to this
2004-10-31 Sun 19:10ct