Dr Kaukab Siddique | Editor-in-Chief ---------------------------------------------------------
Zulq'idah 4, 1426/December 6, 2005 #89
GERMANY has sold two dolphin class submarines to ISRAEL for a throw away price of $320 million. The submarines can target Arab and Iranian cities with nuclear tipped weapons. [Source Fox TV, December 5, 2005.]
[New Trend comment: The German people dare not question such sales to the criminal-thug entity known as Israel. Any German who questions it is dubbed "anti-semitic" and "Nazi." See dear reader, this is the net result of the holocaust story.]
[See below, a non-Muslim commentary by scholar Mark Green on the "holocaust" story.]
STUNNING NEWS: Osama is alive according to a new tape which has surfaced on Arabic TV networks. It has been issued by Ayman al-Zawahiri, second in command of the armed Islamic movement known as al-Qaidah. According to the tape, Osama bin Laden is very much alive and Al-Qaida is gaining support around the world.
[Source: Fox TV, December 6, 2005]
Jamaat al-Muslimeen [2 items]
Peaceful but Persistent
P.O. Box 10881
Baltimore, MD 21234


Sis. Hadayai Majeed has been included among 1,000 women recommended for the Nobel Prize.

Sis. Karen English, author and activist, is Secretary General of Jamaat al-Muslimeen.

Sis. Hamdiyyeh Fatima was recognized by Jamaat al-Muslimeen for providing more information on current Islamic issues than anyone else.

Sis. [Dr.] Zakiyyah Muhammad, great educationist and Islamist, won a case against ISNA-ICNA-supported feudalistic immigrants in Orange County, California.

Sis. Nadrat Siddique is known for her human rights activism. See her article on Babri masjid below.

Sis. Ashira Na'im, leader of many men and women, is the Administrator of a masjid in Baltimore which follows the Sunnah of the Prophet, pbuh.
Jamaat al-Muslimeen CONGRATULATES Prof. Sami Al-Arian on his acquittal on the most serious charges brought against him. Allahu Akbar wa lillahil hamd. This is indeed a slap in the face for Emerson and O'Reilly who worked hard and long to defame and smear Prof. Al-Arian. A totally innocent man has been degraded and demeaned and humiliated for years simply because he is a Palestinian and wants Palestine to prosper.

[Personal congratulations go out from Dr. Kaukab Siddique and Imam Badi Ali [North Carolina] to Prof. Al-Arian and his children, Abdullah and Laylah. His children were so wonderful in that entire ordeal! All Muslims should be proud of them.]

Jamaat al-Muslimeen urges Muslims of America: BREAK YOUR SILENCE, SPEAK OUT OPENLY and CLEARLY against the Zionist oppressors who have taken over America. Prof. Al-Arian had never done anything against America. He suffered simply because he is an Islamic Palestinian. Don't be afraid, dear Muslims, come out and speak against the oppressors, as the Prophet, pbuh, commanded Hassan ibn Thabit, r.a: Do the Hujw [poetic analysis and condemnation] of the oppressors.

[Remember that the Zionists will not give up Prof. Al-Arian easily though they have lost a major battle.]
Jamaat al-Muslimeen also congratulates Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayed Ballut who were acquitted of all charges against them.

And Hatem Naji Fariz had most of the charges against him dismissed.

Excerpts follow from Associated Press' report on the acquittal.
Dec 6, 2005

Al-Arian acquitted on key count of aiding terrorists

Associated Press Writer

TAMPA, Fla. A former Florida professor was acquitted on a key charge Tuesday that he helped lead a Palestinian terrorist group that has carried out suicide bombings against Israel.

In one of the biggest courtroom tests yet of the Patriot Act's expanded search and surveillance powers, the jury acquitted Sami Al-Arian of eight of the 17 counts against him, including a charge of conspiring to maim and murder people overseas.

The jury deadlocked on the others including charges he aided terrorists.

Al-Arian, a former University of South Florida computer engineering professor, wept after the verdicts and his attorney, Linda Moreno hugged him. He will remain jailed until prosecutors decide whether retry him on the deadlocked counts.

Co-defendants Sameeh Hammoudeh and Ghassan Zayed Ballut were acquitted of all charges against them.

Another, Hatem Naji Fariz, was found not guilty of 24 counts and jurors deadlocked on the remaining eight.

The U.S. Justice Department had no immediate comment.

Al-Arian, 47, is considered one of the most important terrorist figures to be brought to trial in the United States since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorism attacks. His indictment in 2003 was hailed by then-Attorney General John Ashcroft as one of the first triumphs of the Patriot Act, which was enacted in the weeks after Sept. 11.

The Patriot Act gave the government greatly expanded powers and broke down the wall between foreign intelligence investigations and domestic law enforcement. In the Al-Arian case, officials said, it allowed separate FBI investigations - one of them a years long secret foreign intelligence probe of the professor's activities - to be combined and all the evidence used against him.

Al-Arian, a Palestinian who was born in Kuwait, has lived in the United States since 1975. He was granted permanent-resident status in 1989 and denied U.S. citizenship in 1996. He was fired by USF shortly after he was indicted.

The federal jury deliberated 13 days after hearing from 80 government witnesses and listening to often-plodding testimony about faxes and wiretapped phone calls during a trial that lasted more than five months.

The government alleged that the defendants were part of a Tampa terrorist cell that took the lead in determining the structure and goals of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which the State Department has listed as a terrorist group.

Prosecutors said Al-Arian and other members of the terrorist organization used the University of South Florida to give them cover as teachers and students, and held meetings under the guise of academic conferences.

Prosecutor Cherie Krigsman likened the Palestinian Islamic Jihad to the Mafia and named Al-Arian as one of its "crime bosses," like TV's Tony Soprano.

The defendants said that although they were vocal advocates in the United States for the Palestinian cause and may have celebrated news of the terrorist group's attacks, the government had no proof that they planned or knew about any violence. They said the money they raised and sent to the Palestinian territories was for legitimate charities.

Al-Arian's attorney, William Moffit, said the professor was being persecuted for espousing unpopular opinions that should be protected under the First Amendment.

"Any discussion of Sami Al-Arian being the most powerful man in the PIJ is fantasy," Moffitt said in his closing argument. "He never had control of the money, he never made any decisions."

The case was built on hundreds of pages of transcripts of wiretapped phone calls and faxes, records of money moving through accounts, documents seized from the defendants' homes and offices, and their own words on video. At times, the participants appeared to speak glowingly of the Palestinian "martyrs" who carried out suicide attacks.

The jury also heard from the father of Alisa Flatow, a New Jersey student killed in a 1995 bus bombing carried out by the terrorist group in Gaza.
"If that is civilization, I prefer savagery." --Dessalines, Haitian Revolution leader

Remembering the Babri Mosque
Comparison with Buddha statues in Afghanistan
By Nadrat Siddique

December 6 is the anniversary of the demolition of the Babri Mosque by Hindu mobs in North India. It is an event of enormous international significance; yet most Americans, seem wholly unaware that it ever happened.

The Babri Mosque (also known as the Masjid-i Janamasthan) was built some time between 1100 and 1600 c.e. Its construction or refurbishment--it's uncertain which--is attributed to the first Moghul Emperor, Babur during his reign (1526-1530).

The largest mosque in Ayodha, (Uttar Pradesh Province, India), it exhibited classic Jaunpuri architectural style, characteristic of the period following the Delhi Sultanate.

The sturdy exterior of the mosque relied on rectangular sandstone bricks. It had one large, and two small elegant domes, and a beautiful fountain for the performance of ablution. Long walls enclosed the main courtyard, lined with intricately decorated pillars and arches characteristic of the period.

The acoustics of the Babri's main hall were the stuff of legend: a whisper from the mihrab could be heard clearly at the opposite end of the hall, 200 feet away. The Babri's well of curative water, said to heal all manner of ailments, drew people of all faiths from far and wide.

The Babri was older than the Taj Mahal, the other famous structure built by a Moghul emperor. It pre-dated the Arc de Triomphe, and was approximately the same age as Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel and St. Peter's Basilica.

No matter.

On December 6, 1992, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP, or World Hindu Council) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) held a rally outside the Babri, inciting Hindus to tear down the c. 900-year old mosque! Although, Muslims and Hindus had peacefully shared access to the site for decades, and the Muslims had not denied the Hindus claim to it, the VHP and BJP leaders claimed that the mosque must be removed, so that an ancient Hindu temple, which [allegedly] lay beneath the site, might be re-constructed there.

Over the course of the day, a mob of Hindus amassed outside the mosque. They numbered around one million! As members of the ruling BJP openly incited members of the mob to violence, destruction of the mosque began in earnest.

While the Babri was being demolished, as well as for hours afterwards, Hindu mobs pillaged the town of Ayodha, killing, burning, looting, and destroying. Only two of Ayodha's many mosques escaped damage or destruction in the rampage.

Following the destruction of the Babri, the BJP continued to maintain excellent relations with the U.S. government, as well as with other Western nations. Remarkably, the BJP's popularity skyrocketed immediately after the demolition. The party remained closely allied to the Bush administration--and to Israel--for the duration of its term in office.

International Significance of the Destruction

On the anniversary of its destruction, a comparison of the Babri's "death" with the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan--at the hands of Afghanistan's Taliban government—is useful. Several major differences between the two incidents of artifact destruction exist:

Publicly Declared Motivation

* The Taliban said: the destruction of the Buddhas protested the fact that UNESCO, NGOs, and the West were pouring money into restoring statues, when Afghanistan's people had endured more than two decades of war, and vast segments of the population were literally starving.
** Acharya Dharmendra, VHP leader, said: "Although the local Hindu residents did ask me to hold the crowds from burning Muslim homes I would have never stopped them. This is the only way in which Ayodha could become like the Vatican."
(Quoted in the Times of India).

Sanctity of Human Life

* The Taliban attacked no human in the process of their action.
** Hindu mobs attacked Muslim households, torching and plundering for nearly twelve hours (per BBC reports) that day. They also attacked journalists.

Time of Construction

* The Buddhas of Bamiyan were built in the fifth or sixth century.
** The Babri mosque was built c. eleventh century.

Right of Worship by Indigenous Populations

* Afghanistan has no known Buddhist population; the Taliban action did not violate the religious rights of any local population which may have used the statues for worship.
** Uttar Pradesh province has a Muslim population numbering roughly thirteen million; the Babri was in active use when it was demolished, violating the right of worship of the Muslim population.

Reconstruction Efforts

* UNESCO and various NGOs were pouring money into restoring the statues—prior to the destruction by the Taliban. Currently, the Japanese government, and many other contributors are funding the rebuilding the Buddhas.
** Currently, no initiatives have been put forth by the Indian—or other governments or NGOs--for the reconstruction of the Babri Mosque. The only efforts to this end have been by the local population, who are very poor.


* After its destruction of art, the Taliban government was largely destroyed by the U.S., and many of its leaders tortured or tortured.
** After its destruction of art, the BJP is regarded as a friend and ally of the U.S.

The Babri mosque destruction once again reveals the hypocrisy of the West in its putative concern over the protection of art and artifacts.

(Thanks to Wikipedia for background information of the Babri Mosque.)

Dr. Siddique's writings now available as Pamphlets for Easy Distribution:

Dr. Gamal Badawi's Blunders about the Meaning of Jihad.
U.S. Muslims as Spies? Rebuttal of Mahdi Bray & Johari A. Malik's Press Conference.
Leading Jewish groups attack Dr. Siddique: A Calm Reply.
An Analytical look at Stephen Schwartz' Wahhabi Bogey.
Also available:
Decoding Tom Friedman by Mike Whitier
"Moderate Islam" in Abu Dharr's Shredder.
[A response to Dr. Muqtedar Khan's views.]

Each of the 6 pamphlets is $1. Order from:
New Trend, P. O. Box 356, Kingsville, MD 21234.

Holocaust Fundamentalism: You WILL Believe

by Mark Green You've seen the films. You've read the books. You've taken the courses. You've heard the news. Soon, your children will be visiting the museums. Everybody knows it's true.

The era of mandatory belief in The Holocaust has arrived. Articles central to The Faith include unwavering commitment to Jewish casualty numbers with a full and complete understanding of the manner in which innocent Jews were gassed, murdered and executed in Nazi Germany. Recalcitrant non-believers are now being rounded up. The typical rhetoric goes: "these bigots deny the facts and lessons garnered from humankind's experience during WWII. Their unique kind of poison will not be tolerated. This is a democracy. You are under arrest."

Only this is not a movie. This is real.

In Europe and North America, Holocaust skeptics are being apprehended, arrested and are now facing lengthy prison terms. Few people have noticed. Nobody's supposed to care. Big media certainly doesn't. Nor the politicians. These Holocaust-denying apostates include British author and historian David Irving, Holocaust revisionist Ernst Zundel, German chemist Gemar Rudolf, and others. Their crimes involve disbelief: they dispute the official version of events involving Jews during WWII.

In an era where nearly anything goes, why does the truth need special laws to protect it? Curious, that.

Beginning Jan. 27, 2006, and continuing every year thereafter, the United Nations will inaugurate its first annual Holocaust Remembrance Day. This Israeli-sponsored resolution not only institutionalizes and broadens global sensitivity to The Holocaust, but it will surely aid in prosecuting individuals who reject official Holocaust dogma. The State Church has arrived. It's creed: Holocaust fundamentalism.

Question: to what extent do these escalating measures have more than nothing to do with America's "special relationship" with the Jewish State, our war in Iraq, and our saber-rattling towards Syria and Iran?
Just curious.

Resistance to the global New Doctrine however is growing. Among the arguments:

Laws regulating 'historical interpretation' are themselves a crime. Take your Thought Control laws and shove it.

Primary question: How many Jews died (and how many were deliberately killed) during WWII? How do we know?

In how many Western Democracies is doubting the "correct number " of Jewish victims during WWII now against the law? (seven)

It's known that after the second world war, the Red Cross put the number of Jewish deaths at considerably less than one million. That's still a lot of dead people. Yes, it is theoretically possible that 6,000,000 Jews were killed during the war, but--forgive me--I sense a bold exaggeration.

But aside from that, since when is skepticism a crime? Where are the bodies, for instance? May I have a list of names, please?

Even the Yard Vashem Holocaust Museum in Israel, after 60 years, can only muster three million names, and many of those names are of Jews who merely died (or disappeared) during WWII, causes unknown. Many names appear more than once. In a similar vein, while the number of Jews murdered at Auschwitz was officially reduced by millions in recent years, the irreducible number of "six million Jews" remains. Isn't it possible that there's some politically-motivated chicanery here?

It is, after all, indisputable that some earlier "facts" regarding the Holocaust have been streamlined and smoothed out for popular consumption. The lamp shade and human soap stories, for instance, have been quietly retired. The secret dealings between Nazis and Zionists during WWII have been suppressed. Another ignored fact concerns the lethal Typhus epidemics in the death camps. Why have they been airbrushed from popular memory?

One problem is that all the "experts" tend to be Jewish and show bias on the subject. How many Germans died in WWII? Five million? Actually I'm not sure, since their suffering isn't supposed to matter and therefore their casualties aren't noted. What was the total number of dead in WWII?--50 million? How many have died in wars during the 20th Century?--275 million? (that's Zbig. Brezinski's estimate). Considering this, even if six million Jews were deliberately killed during WWII, shouldn't we demand that the Zionized world stop caring so singularly about Jewish suffering? The Jewish obsession with everything Jewish is shamefully narcissistic and burdensome. Their defiant ethnocentrism is an ongoing insult to the rest of the human race.

As for the "un-revisable" six million figure, Jews have superstitious reasons pertaining to the number "six" for claiming that six million died. In fact, similar charges about six million Jews were made, incredibly, in 1919, concerning the fantastic number of Jews facing death during WWI. These nutty allegations were even published in the NY Times. The claimants were Jewish.

But why?

Another reason Jews want to hype the number of victims is that they wanted to have the greatest casualty count so they could claim supreme victimhood and reap the political rewards. Holocaust lore is essential to the precarious legitimacy of the Jewish State. Just ask the Palestinians.

But the Holocaust story as now told is a libel on the German people, since it pretends to show that German anti-Semitism sprang from nowhere. But the real story is more complicated.

Rightly or wrongly, the Nazis blamed the Jews for America's entry into WWI as well as the unjust and punitive Treaty of Versailles which followed. It's also undeniable that international Jewry "declared war" (and launched an international boycott) on Hitler's Germany in 1933. Even the outrage know as "Kristallnacht" was provoked in part by a Jewish assassin (Herschel Grynszpan) who, on November 7, 1938, walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot and killed Ernest vom Rath, a German diplomat.

We know, for instance, that soon after the turn of the century, Jews comprised many if not most of the leading political radicals in Europe. They were instrumental in orchestrating and managing the Communist revolution which killed millions of non-Jews well before Hitler's rise. Why aren't the Nazi-hunters interested in finding any of these mass-murderers? Is it justice they're after, or revenge and political advantage? The "innocent little Jewish shopkeeper" archetype as peddled on TV is a self-exculpating myth.

However, that Jews were persecuted and murdered during Hitler's reign is irrefutable. I've never seen or read a Holocaust "denier" who claims otherwise. Not one. The extraordinary claim that "6,000,000 Jews were systematically murdered" is what they contest. This deliberate mischaracterization of Holocaust revisionism has been spread widely and purposefully by keepers of the Holocaust faith. And the disinformation continues to flow.

David Irving, the imprisoned author of dozens of works on WWII, is now alleged to have recently "recanted" some of his "Holocaust denial claims". But his change-of-heart cannot be believed so long as he is being held captive on account of his scholarship.

Historical truth doesn't need to be protected by any special law or speech code. Irving, Zundel, Rudolf and others, need and deserve our unwavering support if we intend to remain even nominally free.

# # #

Mark Green is an independent producer and co-founder of http://www.marwenmedia.com He lives in California. He can be reached at markgreen@flashpoint-tv.net

click here to email a link to this article

2005-12-07 Wed 18:26ct