News  #  1691
[ Click on NEWS for back issues ][ OUR BOOKS ][ Contact ][ Previous Issue ]

30 Rabie' al Thani 1438 A.H.- January 29, 2017 Issue # 5, Newsletter # 1691

Hadith of the Week

Women in the Political Process of the Islamic Movement.

"Aisha the daughter of Qudama, r.a., narrates that she with her mother Raet the daughter of Sufyan, r.a., went to the Prophet, pbuh, to take the oath of allegiance . The Prophet, pbuh, said, I will accept your oath of allegiance on these conditions: that you will not associate any thing whatever with Allah, that you will not steal, that you will not commit adultery (or fornication), that you will not kill your children, that you will not utter slander, intentionally forging falsehood, and that you will not disobey me in any just matter. Then he added, 'according to your ability and power.' All the women affirmed the oath. I affirmed with them while my mother urged me to remember 'according to your ability.'

[Musnad of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, hadith number 27602]

Comments by Kaukab Siddique:The words of the oath are from the Qur'an, 60:12. The Qur'an and the hadith are always together. Obedience in Islam is only in MA'ROOF, that which is clearly good and just.. Notice that there is no obedience to the husband here as some misled Muslims have fabricated. Maulana Maudoodi ;pointed out in his tafseer, Tafheem ul Qur'an, that obedience even to the Prophet, pbuh, is in the known GOOD, not a personal or cult type obedience. A similar oath was taken from men.The Islamic movement is a disciplined group of men and women working for the cause of Allah. There is no inferiority or superiority except in God-conscious behavior [TAQWA];

 Local Outreach

Jamaat al-Muslimeen Activity in Baltimore County. 100 met.

On January 27, a 4-page Jamaat al-Muslimeen document was given to 100 Muslims after Juma' at Masjid Rahma in the suburbs of western Baltimore. The crowd was large and included Indian, Pakistani, Arab and African origin Muslims. Good numbers of women were there.The khutba was given by an imam visiting from Iowa who taught from chapter 31 of the Qur'an about the teachings of the sage Luqman to his son.

The Jamaat al-Muslimeen 4-pager given to 100 contained these items:

  1. The quest for peace in Kashmir [by Dr. Fai].

  2. Russians and Iran destroyed
    Aleppo but Assad still can't win. [Monitor]

  3. Mosul , Iraq, standing firm against large Shia army. [Reuters, ABC etc]

  4. Is the return of Jesus, pbuh, an authentic Islamic belief? [Imam Ali Siddiqui]

Political Prisoners :



Umar, r.a., ibn al-Khattab, central hero of the Battle of Uhud, targeted by Abusive Shi'ie Fabrications.
by Kaukab Siddique

Shias in our times have become very active in constructing a variant to Islam in which they try to abuse the greatest Muslims with the support of fabricated stories which were distributed through gossip and story telling HUNDREDS OF YEARS after the BATTLE OF UHUD. . Some of these stories aimed specifically at Umar, r.a., can be seen in the collection known as al-Mustadrak and similar books. These days on the Internet Shias like [names deleted] are busy spreading this gossip. One item which is their favorite is that Umar, r.a., ran away from the battlefield of Uhud.

I have available to me the classical books of Islamic history which report on the battle of Uhud. The most distinguished and earliest biographer of the life of the Prophet, pbuh, was Ibn Ishaq who wrote Sirat Rasul Allah which chronicles the battle of Uhud in year 6 of Hijri. In this battle the Muslims were initially victorious but they put down their weapons and started collecting the spoils of war left behind by the fleeing kuffar of Makka.

At this point Khalid ibn al-Waleed who was not a Muslim at that time attacked from an unguarded flank and slaughtered many of the Muslims. The Prophet, pbuh, was injured and took refuge on a hilly knoll to which in his hurt condition he was carried by Talha, r.a., one of the Sahaba [who was promised paradise by the Prophet, pbuh]. Talha, r.a., for this act of saving the Prophet, pbuh, is highly honored.

Only a handful of Sahaba were with the Prophet, pbuh, on this hilly knoll. Khalid and his cohorts tried to reach this small group to kill them. Here is how Ibn Ishaq describes it:

"When the Prophet, pbuh, was in the glen, with a number of his companions, a troop of quraysh came up the mountain. The Prophet, pbuh, said, O Allah, it is not fitting that they should be above us, so 'Umar and a number of muhajerin fought them until they drove them down the mountain."

[Ibn Ishaq, p.383, English translation THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD by Guillaume.]

The Quraysh could not see Muhammad, pbuh, and thought they had killed him. When Abu Sufyan, leader of the Quraysh at that time, thought he had won, he shouted to the Muslims on the hill that he and his god Hubal had won. Here we again quote Ibn Ishaq:

"The prophet, pbuh, told 'Umar, r.a., to get up and answer Abu Sufyan and say, Allah is most High and most Glorious. We are not equal. our dead are in paradise, your dead in hell.' At this call from Umar, r.a., Abu Sufyan said to 'Umar, r.a., Come here to me. ' The Prophet, pbuh, told 'Umar, r.a., to go and see what he was up to. When Umar, r.a., met him Abu Sufyan said: I call on you by the most holy O Umat, have we killed Muhammad? ' Umar, r.a., said: By Allah you have not . He is listening to to what you are saying right now.' Abu Sufyan said: 'I regard you as more truthful and reliable than Ibn, Qami'a' [who had claimed to have killed Muhammad, pbuh.]"

Ibn Ishaq, p.386.

Imam Bukhari and Ibn Saad have narrated with sahih chains of narration that Abu Bakr, r.a.,was with the prophet, pbuh and Umar, 'r.a. in this entire situation.

I urge the Shias and Agha Khanis to cease and desist from their attacks on Umar, r.a.and Abu Bakr, r.a.,

 Breaking News

German Grandma Sentenced for Denying the Holocaust Story:


Woman Stopped for Immigration In front of her home.

Courtesy CBS. Jan. 28.

BEL AIR, Md. (WJZ) — A Maryland woman is asked her immigration status while taking a walk in her Harford County neighborhood.

But, the Bel Air police Department is owning up to its misstep and says it will learn from this.

"I didn't expect this to happen in Bel Air. Walking while brown? He said, 'no, no, no, nothing like that,'" says Bel Air resident Aravinda Pillalamarri.

Pillalamarri tells WJZ Bel Air police officers demanded her ID after a resident called her in as suspicious.

"I had just come out for a walk, so I didn't have my ID. And he said, "Why don't you have id? Are you here illegally?" says Pillalamarri.

Bel Air Police Chief Charles Moore says asking her nationality is insensitive, but not racial profiling.

"They were trying to figure out why there was some hesitation to provide identification, that's why he asked if she was illegal," says Moore.

Pillalamarri is an American citizen. But promises from President Donald Trump have brought sensitivity on the issue of undocumented immigration into question.

"People are uncertain, we don't know what to expect. So this is really, I think, a reflection of that uncertainty that people are feeling," says Dr. Zainab Choudry, with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

Chief Moore, and Pillalamari, who shared her experience at a town hall meeting are both seeing this as a chance for real change.

"That's an education for me, that's helped me out to see that, not only do I have to get my officers trained, I have to get the dispatchers trained on how to react to a situation like that in the future," says Chief Moore.

Prying open a discussion about diversity and civil rights in central Maryland.

"Social justice starts locally, and I'm really proud that bel air is rising to that challenge," says Pillalamari.

Chief Moore, who's only been in his position for a year and a half, says he'll also be looking at strengthening the department's policies.

Bel Air is also developing a citizen's advisory board to discuss similar

News Within the U.S.


A Great New Effort for the Basic Human Rights of Dr. Omar Abdel Rahman [the Blind Shaykh]
by Sis. Ayesha Jones and Br. Ali Randall [Jamaat al-Muslimeen]
 Shaykh Dr Omar Abdel Rahman

To write him that was the blind sheikh's address...

Omar Ahmad Rahman
P.O. BOX 1600
BUTNER, NC 27509

He is 78 years old with diabetes. His health is deteriorating. Please offer major du'a for him.... astaghfirullah.

Here's the number and address to Contact the facility: Address:

BUTNER, NC 27509
Email: BUH/
Phone: 919-575-3900
Fax: 919-575-4801

And a strange letter to discourage the effort:

Mauri Salaakhan [from Maryland] wrote: "ASA: in the case of Sheikh Omar, what are you asking folk to contact the facility for? It would be best to just ask folk to pray for him, and to occasionally send him post cards containing supportive messages."
- Saalakhan.

Ayesha replied to his comment saying..." Y shouldn't we contact the u know who he is? He's older than anyone in prison... he has diabetes, he's blind, being tortured everyday and u got the nerve to ask why should we contact the facility... u want to contact Aafia you realize who he just shows the cowardliness in the Muslims....there's a thing called action...we just don't talk... I'm going to write, call, protest ,,, he has been mistreated in prison for over 20 years and he is a real scholar on our soil!!!
Oh brother I'm very disappointed in your comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

RESEARCH: Denying Denial

 David Irving

Answering the HBO Movie "DENIAL" which attacks David Irving. Responses from CODOH associates.

Photo: David Irving

David Merlin has a Bachelor of Arts degree in history and economics from the University of California, Berkeley. He also has a Juris Doctor. He is currently writing a book on the "Irving vs. Lipstadt" trial. He is a frequent contributor to the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust,

Gerard Menuhin is a British-Swiss journalist, writer, novelist, and film producer. He is the son of Jewish parents, the American violinist and conductor Yehudi Menuhin, who is considered "one of the greatest violinists of the 20th century." Menuhim's mother was a ballet dancer and died in 2003 at the age of 90. He graduated from Stanford University and is the author of the new book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil.

Fred A. Leuchter has a Bachelor of Arts degree in history from Boston University in 1964. He holds patents for a geodetic instrument and an electronic sextant. The New York Times admitted back in 1990 that Leuchter "was the nation's leading adviser to states on capital punishment and who supplied lethal injection systems to four states." Leuchter also wrote A Technical Report On The Execution Of The Gas At Mississippi State Penitentiary Parchman, Mississippi back in 1972.

But Leuchter's prosperous career that came to an abrupt end after he began to question the validity of the gas chamber stories in Nazi Germany in 1988. The Holocaust establishment quickly condemned him as a forger and hoaxer.[1] Deborah Lipstadt declares that Leuchter used "his pseudoscientific work to assault the truth."[2]

David Merlin: The movie Denial is the Holocaust Establishment's latest insult to the intelligence of the public. Denial is loosely based on the defamation trial between British historian David Irving and Holocaust studies professor Deborah Lipstadt and is loudly promoted as an "incredible, unbelievable story of two people pitted against each other in a battle over truth, history and integrity."

In fact, the movie's screenwriter David Hare seems to have stood truth on its head with distortions of fact, misstatements of events and omissions of inconvenient evidence.

Hare and Lipstadt's partisans have gone as far as claiming a messianic role for Lipstadt (always a good way to deceive the people,) announcing her as "a latter-day Jewish heroine of truly biblical proportions," and claiming mystical premonitions, "mother always said there was going to be an event. I was picked out, she said. I was chosen."

But claims of being a biblical heroine or "chosen" aside, Lipstadt did not win the litigation for reasons of divine intervention but because of millions of dollars poured into the case; estimates are of $12,000,000 spent on the defense. One member of Lipstadt's vast legal team boasted that,

"I helped raise the funds, and worked with the lawyers, graduate students and experts, sometimes from London, and sometimes from my home in Brooklyn (where [during the Trial] the courtroom stenographer's real-time transcript appeared on my computer, and I could communicate with a paralegal with a vibrating cell phone in the courtroom, if need be)."[3]

Jonas E. Alexis: Denial was never about telling the whole truth. If it were, then producers of the movie would have brought certain facts on the big screen which would have almost certainly stunned moviegoers everywhere. For example, the movie should have brought the fact there were at least 150,000 people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany—and Hitler knew about this![4]

If there were a deliberate and clear order to exterminate all the Jews in Germany, then the Jews in Nazi Germany would have to be executed as well, an unpersuasive and unarticulated argument which can only make sense to those who have already subscribed to the Holocaust narrative.

As it turns out, the Holocaust narrative continues to thrive in society because, as Norman Finkelstein puts it, it is an industry which exploits real Jewish suffering.[5] Flaming Neocon Charles Krauthammer himself has said that the Holocaust narrative has become "the dominant feature of Jewishness in America."[6] Last year alone, Georgetown University got $10 million "for Holocaust research."[7]

Did the movie ever point out how the Holocaust establishment exploits what really happened in Nazi Germany? Did they tell viewers that Hollywood produces at least one or two Holocaust movies every single year but has yet to release a single movie on the Bolshevik Revolution or on Stalin's genocide or on Mao's Great Leap Forward or on any other Jewish revolutionary movement? Is that really fair and honest?

Moreover, if historian Norman M. Naimark is right in saying that "genocide has been a part of human history from its very beginnings,"[8] why are we memorializing one genocide to the exclusion of all the others? Can the Holocaust establishment explain this phenomenon for us?

David Merlin: The most brazen lie of the film is that the Trial "proved the Holocaust." The Trial judge (Charles Gray) specifically stated:

"It is no part of my function to attempt to make findings as to what actually happened during the Nazi regime." Judgment 13.3.

Irving opened the case telling the court, "I have never held myself out to be a Holocaust expert, nor have I written books about what is now called the Holocaust." Trial Transcript Day 1, page 13.

The case is better described as a wide-ranging questioning of Irving's competence as a historian; an ex-post-facto effort to substantiate Lipstadt's claim that Irving had falsified the historical record.

Judge Gray broke the alleged falsification of historical facts into 4 elements:

"(a) 19 specific individual criticisms of Irving's historiography [which covered esoteric points like Hitler's 1924 trial or a mistranslation of a telephone log entry for Deceber 1, 1941]; (b) his portrayal of Hitler... (c) his claims in relation to Auschwitz (d) the bombing of Dresden."

Item (c) (Irving's claims in relation to Auschwitz) received the most media attention. It was also the area in which Irving had little knowledge or experience. Irving ended up having to defend his "tasteless" comments made off-the-cuff before some right-wing groups.

The technical questions of whether certain buildings could have been homicidal gas chambers only related to Auschwitz and not to Treblinka, Sobibor or any other alleged "Extermination Camps."

In fact, Irving really only challenged the operation of one gas chamber at Auschwitz, Krema II. Neither was the operation of the Einsatzgruppen addressed at the Trial. Ironically, the claim that the Trial "proved the Holocaust" is a falsification of history similar to Lipstadt's accusations against Irving.

Jonas E. Alexis: Needless to say, neither Hare nor the promoters of Denial wanted to hear Irving's side of the story. Irving said that the producers of the movie never contacted him to get his point of view. He said:

"Ridley Scott was directing the original version, but the newspapers say he quit when HBO asked him to include fictional elements. I have not seen anything of 'Denial' but bits of trailers: the opening scene, of my first confrontation with Lipstadt in Atlanta in November 1994, is fictional; it happened, but my actual challenge, waving $1,000 in notes in the air, was: 'If you will now show this audience the actual blueprint you just told this audience that you have, I will give you these notes.' See our video of the scene, posted on YouTube. They have changed that wording materially."

Irving, in my humble opinion, made a cardinal mistake when he challenged Deborah Lipstadt in court. Instead of challenging an entire empire in court, Irving should have meticulously read Lipstadt's diatribes and carefully responded to them point by point in a book. That would have killed the Holocaust establishment—and Lipstadt in particular—with a bang.

Let us just say in passing that Lipstadt will not listen to the voice of reason at all. She is a thought-police, therefore any criticism of Israel—such as Zionism is racism or Israel is an apartheid state—is anti-Semitism.[9]

If Lipstadt can call the so-called alternative right "white supremacists" who are "just like Holocaust deniers"[10] without an scintilla of serious arguments, then one can say that this lady is struggling mightily to string two coherent thoughts together. In fact, she came to teach at Emory not because of her serious scholarship, but because of the Jewish influence.[11]

One can say that Lipstadt's "scholarly" endeavor began when she started to assign the book Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood 1939-1948 to her students. The Holocaust memoir of Benjamin Wilkomirski, Fragments came out in 1995 and enjoyed immediate success across Europe and the English-speaking world.[12]

As it turns out, the whole story was a complete hoax, a fabrication by a non-Jew who was not even in any of the camps. Despite the revelation of Fragments as a hoax, Deborah Lipstadt stated the book was still "powerful as a novel."

This brings to light the driving ideology behind those who use the Holocaust as a weapon to subvert history. Lipstadt in particular has been using the so-called Holocaust to beat the Goyim over the head.[13] As Norman Finkelstein points out, the "Holocaust industry" exploits real Jewish suffering.[14]

But if the Holocaust industry wants to produce and reproduce lies and fabrications and deceptions, as in the case of Lipstadt's Denying the Holocaust and Michael Shermer's Denying History, then a meticulous historian like Irving should have refuted those lies in a historical and scholarly study, not in a courtroom where the odds, not the truth, are obviously against you. Would Irving do it again? He said:

"I would do it again—she is ignorant beyond words. Her ongoing astonishment at finding that in England libel law requires that you can prove what you claim says it all. The fact is that the judge despite all found her guilty of the other easy libels she uttered. She stayed out of the witness box, on no doubt good advice. She wrote that I spoke to extremists like Hezbollah in Sweden: I had never been in that country and that is still true, and have never dealt with Hezbollah.

"She wrote that I stole the Goebbels diaries from the Moscow archives in 1992, a very wounding allegation, which a simple query to me or Moscow would have shown to be untrue: she wrote that I had a large painting of Hitler in my study, untrue. Ditto. And so on. What should I do? If I leave the small lies uncontested, the big liars win. The judgment agreed that these were libels, but...

"I sued after her lies were published, not before. That is the difference. My lawsuit asked for token damages from her and her UK publisher, the amount being only five hundred pounds, to be paid to a charity for limbless amputees in memory of my oldest daughter. The publishers showed themselves willing to settle on that basis—and were threatened then with legal action by their joint tortfeasor, Lipstadt. These are all unknown facts."

To do the trial again would not be wise, in my opinion. Irving already has the historical background to refute promiscuous claims about Nazi Germany and World War II, and if he wants people to learn more about the truth of what truly happened, he should certainly be thinking about a scholarly and historical study of how the "traditional enemy of the truth," as he calls the establishment, has perverted, inverted, and subverted his words for ideological purposes. Deborah Lipstadt, as Jim W. Dean rightly put it, is

"a holocaust terrorist and it is time to get that phrase into the lexicon as she plays a roll similar to the Jihadi head choppers, to sew fear in the ranks of all non-believers...

"Her handlers fed her hoaxed research, like Irving having a huge painting of Hitler in his office behind his desk, and that his father served Franco in the Spanish Civil War, and much more. None of this was true but Lipstadt had no problem with putting it in."

Be that as it may, the movie does contain some information which may lead the careful viewer to start doing serious investigation. During an interview after the movie was released, Lipstadt declared that she told the producers to "tell the truth" in the narrative.

The whole truth? Not really.

In the movie, Lipstadt's team declared that they sent the questions to Irving long before the trial, so that he wouldn't be surprised about the "plot." I asked Irving whether that was true. He responded: "Completely untrue."

More importantly, how can the movie be completely accurate when Irving was not even invited to provide his take on it? The producers may not like his comments, but at least they should have given him the opportunity to say something—good or bad. So for Lipstadt to say that the movie is completely accurate is categorically false. Michael Hoffman comments,

"In the movie, Lipstadt is outraged that her lawyers will not call on 'survivors' to testify. The head of her defense team, Anthony Julius, has a response. We first meet Julius while he is holding a copy of the book he authored which, we see from the cover, traduces the reputation of the esteemed Christian poet T.S. Eliot. Julius informs Prof. Lipstadt that he will not call the 'survivors' because he wants to spare them the disrespect which Irving (who acted as his own attorney), would demonstrate toward them in cross-examination.

"It's a weak alibi. The honchos of Holocaustianity are painfully aware that putative 'homicidal Auschwitz gas-chamber eyewitnesses' were eviscerated under cross-examination by lawyer Doug Christie during the 1985 trial in Canada of Ernst Zündel, for spreading 'false news.' This was the actual reason there was no appearance by them at Lipstadt's trial. At this point in the film, as I sat in the theater I jotted in my review notes, 'Movie omits to mention Zündel trial's discrediting cross-examinations of Judaic witnesses.'

"Later in the movie however, Lipstadt demands once again that "Holocaust survivors" testify, and this time a more-candid Julius, albeit in rapid-fire dialogue, tells her that he can't call on them because, 'The survivors were torn apart at the Zündel trial.'

"Exactly correct! When so-called 'eyewitness Holocaust survivors' were cross-examined in the Zündel case, as detailed in this writer's The Great Holocaust Trial, not one departed the witness stand with his credibility intact—and it is Hollywood's Denial movie that reminds the world of this shocking and embarrassing fact, which shatters the main pillar upon which Auschwitz execution-gas-chamber mythology depends: the 'undeniable' testimony of 'eyewitnesses.'

David Merlin: This is confirmed by a report from behind the scenes, "One of the main themes is the lawyers' clarity...that no survivors would be called to testify. Lipstadt was on board with those decisions more easily than the film portrays."[15]

Hare left many inconvenient facts out of the movie. Stern notes a few without seeing the reason for the omissions, "The 'behind the scenes' work on the case was not portrayed in the movie, and many of the in-court events of note weren't either, including testimony from world-class historians such as Peter Longerich and Christopher Browning."

The immense effort going on behind the scenes was "forgotten" by Hare because, in fact, Lipstadt did little during the trial except to dodging testifying and spending the days sitting in court looking confused. Showing the huge expensive defense team would tarnish what little bit of "Erin Brockovic shine" the director and screenwriter managed to paint Lipstadt with. It would also underscore the economic disparity of the parties and the highlight the injustice of a system where money buys the result.

Christopher Browning needed to be left out for a very important reason: He agreed with Irving that there was never a Hitler Order for the mass killings of European Jews. Irving's revelation has thrown Holocaust believers into confusion over the German decision-making process regarding the alleged program of organized mass killings. No one seems to have made a decision! Brown testified in the Trial,

"What had not been studied before you published was a particular focus on decision-making process and Hitler's role. That is one part and, insofar as we can confine ourselves to that, indeed, your publication of Hitler's War was the impetus for the research in that area."

Peter Longerich was the defense witness who claimed that, (since there was on Hitler Order or sign of Hitler's involvement) the Germans communicated with "a secret code. But Judge Gray dismissed the theory, writing,

"Much of the argument revolved around questions of translation. I did not derive much assistance from the debate as to how words such as ausrotten, vernichten, abschaffen, umsiedeln and abtransportieren are to be translated

Jonas E. Alexis: There are some truths in the movie. It claims that Fred Leuchter took some samples without permission from the authorities and wrapped them in his "dirty underwear." I asked Leuchter about the claim, and here's his response:

"Yes, I took Forensic Samples from the alleged execution facilities in Poland without permission from the Authorities in Poland. I was acting as an Expert Forensic Engineer seeking the Truth for a Court as I had done a number of times in the past. I am not aware that investigating a lie is illegal in Poland or anywhere else.

"I did not damage anything and no one could tell where I had been without my scientific record as presented to the Court! Those who would perpetuate the lie would have prevented my getting the Forensic Samples to a proper laboratory for analysis.

So yes, I mixed the samples (which were properly sealed in sample bags) with dirty underwear hoping that the customs agents would not search the same. They did not and the Truth was forthcoming from the Laboratory Analysis for the Court.

"I do not know what other erroneous pronouncements were made about my work in the Movie but, if you advise me, I would be happy to comment on them and set the record straight."

Jonas E. Alexis: One of the characters in the movie makes a good point: 'Be that as it may, we can criticize his (yours) methods but it is his conclusions we have to discredit.' That's a very good question. What makes your conclusions true? Did you fabricate things as you go along? Were you being honest with the material?

Fred Leuchter: My methods were in conformance with my instructions from a Forensic Chemist from Dupont (who was familiar with HCN). All my samples were religiously preserved for their scientific integrity. My conclusions were true and correct to which any unbiased expert chemist will attest. HCN acts a certain way in the environment and the testing was done in accordance with the nature of the chemical. I fabricated nothing. I was honest and forthcoming here as I had been in the past with my other forensic work in court.

I have a reputation which was well earned. I would do nothing to tarnish it. I did not expect all the problems that I faced. I believed that an expert witness is an adjunct to the Court System and was inviolate as are judges, lawyers and legislators in the performance of their duties to the court and the law.

I did not expect the lies that would come forth about me. If an expert Witness cannot function with personal impunity within the court system then our system fails in its attempt to seek and find Truth and without Truth there can be no Justice. This whole affair has been a sad commentary on our legal system.

For more than a quarter of a Century I have maintained this position and I will retain this backbone 'till I die. I have been threatened, I have been firebombed, I have been chased by the Mossad and have been offered bribes. My business was destroyed, my life disrupted and I still adhere to the Truth.

If anyone can question my honesty they must be crazy. I began my work as an Expert on Execution Technology to prevent torture with the return of the Death Penalty in the United States. In this I have failed because the Jewish Groups that came after me also came after the Wardens and a State Officials who dealt with me.

By frightening them they managed to remove me from the equation and the torture not only continued but increased. In the past quarter century all of the Executees who have been tortured are the responsibility of these Jewish Groups that have attempted to discredit me. These people should be ashamed of themselves."

Jonas E. Alexis: Have independent scholars and researchers looked at your samples, methods and conclusions and declared that they are right in line with forensic research? How have you been able to hold up through the years, despite of what they have written about you?

Fred Leuchter: Yes they have. I have held up well except they destroyed my business and livelihood!

Jonas E. Alexis: Menuhin, what's your take on the whole issue here?

Gerard Menuhin: I also watched a long David Irving interview which was one of the videos attached. Of course he's a real and respected historian, whereas I'm not even an amateur historian, just an observer. But I was disappointed at his assumption that — as I gathered — about 2 million were gassed, after all. This is based on his research, interpretation of German documents, visits to sites, etc.

My conclusion is the same as Faurisson's and others, and expressed in my book. Being only a primitive commentator, I had to bolster my instinct with my personal experiences of Germans and Germany, earned primarily during my schooldays there. Apart from the evidence provided by numerous scientific as well as historical sources, it's not in the German character to murder defenceless men, let alone women and children, on racial or any other grounds.

However, it was in their enemy's character to starve to death millions of the invented-for-the-purposes-category of 'Disarmed Enemy Forces' (actually POWs) in the Rheinwiesenlagers. It's demonstrably true that attributing your own crimes to your enemy is their regular strategy (gas vans, cattlecars of the 'Russian' Revolution).

Irving should not have sued Lipstadt, or, having decided to sue her, he should at least have engaged a lawyer to advise him about the legal, as opposed to the historical, aspects of the case. Britain has been infiltrated by the enemy since 1066, and controlled and largely guided by them since at least 1694 (Bank of England).

So any attempt to win in court is fraught with inherent hindrances. Once one has accepted that they lie as a matter of policy, there is little point in suing them for anything they say.

"He invents new lies daily, against which his opponent must from then on defend himself, and the result is that he, through self-justification, never gets to what the Jew really fears: to attacking him. Now the accused has become the accuser, and, with much clamour, he presses the accuser into the dock. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with Jews." (Dr. J. Goebbels, 1929)

I disagree with Hoffmann's optimistic conclusion that one should thank 'Hollywood' for the film, on account of its unwilling revelations. 'Denial' will be debated as serious history by movie-going audiences who swallowed 'Schindler's List' and other pap, as if it were mandatory research for a doctoral thesis.

When a 'post-truth' era is being broadcast by parties promoting their interest in such a fact-free environment, the subtleties Hoffman (an informed viewer) mentions will pass them by. An effective antidote to this visual vacuity might have been a gritty documentary, in which the hideous Lipstadt would have been trapped into revealing her ignorance of history and her shameless prejudice.

David Merlin: Instead, alas, the vast monetary resources and media influence which crushed Irving and allowed the defendants to succeed at Trial have continued their work with the production of a movie that is little more than a brazen web of deceit.

Daniel 8:25: "And through his shrewdness He will cause deceit to succeed by his influence."

  1. See Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman, Denying History: Who Says the Holocaust Never Happened and Why Do They Say It? (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002).

  2. Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (New York: Plume, 1994), 177.

  3. Kenneth S. Stern, "My behind-the-scenes 'Denial' story," Jewish Journal, September 15, 2016.

  4. See Bryan Mark Rigg, Hitler's Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002); Lives of Hitler's Jewish Soldiers: Untold Tales of Men of Jewish Descent Who Fought for the Third Reich (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009); for similar studies, see also Bryan Mark Rigg, Rescued from the Reich: How One of Hitler's Soldiers Saved the Lubavitcher Rebbe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).

  5. Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (New York: Verso, 2000).

  6. Charles Krauthammer, "The Holocaust and Jewish identity," Washington Post, March 10, 2016.

  7. Nick Anderson and Michelle Boorstein, "Georgetown gets $10 million for Holocaust research as Jewish studies grow at Catholic school," Washington Post, February 24, 2016.

  8. Norman M. Naimark, Genocide: A World History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), 1.

  9. See E. Michael Jones, "Holocaust Denial and Thought Control: Deborah Lipstadt at Notre Dame," Culture Wars, May 2009.

  10. "The Risks Of Normalizing The So-Called Alt-Right," National Public Radio, November 27, 2016.

  11. D. D. Guttenplan, The Holocaust on Trial (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001), 67-68.

  12. Melissa Katsoulis, Literary Hoaxes: An Eye-Opening History of Famous Frauds (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, 2009), 237.

  13. For those who would like to pursue this issue further, I would recommend Germar Rudolf's book, Fail: "Denying the Holocaust": How Deborah Lipstadt Botched Her Attempt to Demonstrate the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (Uckfield: Castle Hill Publishers, 2016).

  14. Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (New York: Verso, 2000).

  15. Kenneth S. Stern, "My behind-the-scenes 'Denial' story," Jewish Journal, September 15, 2016


A Restaurant in Karachi Feeds 30,000 Needy People for Free

Islamic Leader Says, Trump could do to USA what Gorbachev did to USSR. Muslim World will Defend Holy Cities against Trump: Sirajul Haq

LAHORE, Jan. 29: Ameer, Jamaat e Islami, Pakistan, Senator Sirajul Haq, has said that a vilification campaign had been started against him only because he wanted across the board accountability. He was addressing a big public meeting at Karak where well known social figure and trader of the area Shabbir Khan Khattak, announced his joining the JI along with more than 350 colleagues. Sirajul Haq said he was demanding ruthless accountability of the corrupt whether they were from the government or the opposition. " If this is a crime, I would accept my guilt and fight against corruption at every front until the plunderers were jailed", he added.

He said that the JI had launched its drive against corruption much before the Panama leaks and now it had become public demand. He said he had tried for evolving a system to check corruption. The JI had also supported the oppositions ToRs but the government paid no heed. As such, the JI had no option except to move the Supreme Court.

Sirajul Haq said that Pakistan and corruption could not coexist and added that if some five to six thousand corrupt people were to be sacrificed to secure the future of two hundred million people, this would not a bad bargain. He said that the solution of the problems facing the country and the nation lay in the Islamic revolution, and added that corrupt people could not bring about this revolution. Referring to the policies of the new US President Donald Trump, the JI chief said that the Trump's policies would drown the US soon in the way Gorbachev's policies led to the dismemberment of the USSR. He said that Trump was opening a new battle front against the Muslims every day. He said that Makkah and Madina were the centers of the Muslim' s love and faith and whoever dared to cast an evil eye on these, the Muslim Ummah would pull out those eyes.

The JI chief counseled Trump not to follow in the footsteps of Abraha who attacked Kaaba with an army of elephants but was devastated by small birds.

India has no right to celebrate Republic Day: Free Kashmir Leader Turabi says India Violates Human rights

by Qaiser Sharif

Lahore 25 January. (PR): Jamaat-e-Islami Azad Jammu and Kashmir President Abdul Rasheed Turabi has termed celebration of 26th January as Republic Day of India, which continues to usurp the Kashmiris' fundamental human rights, has nothing to do with democratic norms and credentials.

Abdur Rasheed Turabi in a statement issued in Islamabad a day ahead of India's Republic Day said that New Delhi has no right to celebrate the day as long as it continues to violate the UN Security Council resolutions on Kashmir and tramples human rights values of Kashmiri people, granted under UN charter. He pointed out that Indian leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru had pledged to give people of Jammu and Kashmir their right to choose their future through plebiscite.

Abdur Rasheed Turabi called upon the international community to take cognizance of human rights violations by India in occupied Kashmir. He said that people of Kashmir will observe India's Republic Day as black day in occupied Kashmir, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan and elsewhere in the world. The JI AJ President said that killing of Burhan Wani has once again exposed India at the global level, and the world has become well aware of the undemocratic face of India.

War News

 War News

Setbacks and Reinforcements

According to VOA, another 2300 US troops were sent to Afghanistan on January 9 owing to Taliban advances, bringing the number of US troops to 9600.

Another serious problem is that Islamic State fighters have re-taken Nangarhar province after they were driven out last year owing to severe US bombing.

Mosul Week 15. Trump Week 1.
String of towns in IS hands en route to Mosul. Armada Stalled.

On January 23 the US-backed regime announced that it had captured all of eastern Mosul. On January 24, the regime announced, that was not correct. Fighting continues in eastern Mosul. On January 25 Baghdad again announced that all of eastern Mosul had been captured and the ruler "congratulated" Iraq. However on January 29, the US commander pointed out that, yes, most of eastern Mosul had been captured but "operations continue" in several areas.

The other disturbing situation for the regime is that a string of towns all the way from Kirkuk to Mosul are in IS hands and from there the fighters are raiding regime troops. One such raid IS videotaped showing that its fighters have night goggles.

IS is well entrenched in Hawija where the Islamic police collected and burned all the cigarettes found in the city.

IS fighters have been spotted in Diyala province near the Iranian frontier.

Another aspect of the regime's frustration is that IS is successfully beating back repeated attacks by fanatical groups of Shia militias who are trying to capture Tal Afar. As of January 29, Tal Afar remains in the hands of the IS mujahideen. [Al Jazeera] It's strategically located on the Iraq Syria border.

On top of all that Islamic State fighters are hitting the invading Shia army with tiny drones with bombs attached which they were till now only using for spotting.

As if that were not enough, the UN is complaining that in the Mosul areas which the regime entered, civilians are being subjected to extreme forms of torture and beatings. by Shias. The sitution is so bad that UN pressure has led to the Baghdad regime leader ordering an inquiry into the Shi'ite human rights abuses in parts of eastern Mosul.


Russian-Iranian-Shia Offensive to Re-take Deir Ez Zor Fails. Fighting in Barada valley: Regime advances. Idlib Province: Pro-Turkish groups hit hard by al-Nusra.

Turkey still bombing El-Bab. SDF Advance on al-Raqqa beaten back.

Fifteen days of fighting at Deir ez-Zor results in IS victory. The heaviest fighting was from January 23-January 29. According to the Syrian Observatory and other sources, the Islamic State has split Deir ez Zor in two and captured the area all around it. The Assad regime's garrison is now besieged in an enclave of the city.

According to the Syrian Observatory calm has returned to the area after the regime offensive ended. Iranian artillery, Russian air strikes, Assadi missile attacks and tank columns were used to push back IS but failed.

The daily bombing by Russia and artillery attacks by Iran killed 87 civilians in the areas of Deir ezZor under IS control. These include 14 children and 18 women. In the nearby towns, the attackers killed another 49 civilians including 9 children and 12 women.

The assault inflicted heavy losses on IS including 190 killed. But when the Hizbullah and regime forces and shia militias tried to advance on the city, they retreated after losing 150 killed, according to SOHR documentation. In addition IS has captured nearly 400 civilians associated with the regime.

In Barada, near Damascus, the regime forces advanced and after bitter fighting secured the source of the water for Assad's capital. However fighting in the Barada larger area continues as the civilian FSA related fighters continue to put up stiff resistance to Hizbullah.

On January 29 Russian and regime jets bombed Islamic control areas in the northern countryside of Hama including the fighting group known as Jaysh al-Izza. This group wanted to support the Russian-Turkish cease fire but owing to the attacks has decided to end the cease fire.

In the northern center of Syria, Turkish bombing of IS stronghold of El Bab continues on a daily basis. The bombing is indiscriminate and has raised the civilian death toll to nearly 300. Turkey is unable to advance as the IS defense is stiff.

Regime troops are advancing towards El Bab area to take advantage of the Turkish-IS stalemate.

SDF which was advancing towards al-Raqqa has been hit by an IS counterattack and its advance has stopped.

In Idlib province, after the US air force killed large numbers of al-Nusra fighters, the pro-Turkish militias attacked al-Nusra but were beaten very severely. These pro-Turkish militia are called Ahrar al-Sham and are considered sell-outs by al-Nusra because they have endorsed western peace talks with Bashar Assad.

Russia has now admitted that the Bashar Assad regime was weeks away from falling when Russia intervened.



Downfall of the Muslims: A Review

Dr Firoz Mahboob Kamal

The betrayal of the objective

The early Muslims gained unprecedented successes. Their success were not confined in war fronts or civilisation-building. They achieved successes almost in all fields. They could add record speed to the spread of Islam. They made Muslims the most reckoned World Power within decades. They raised higher values, established rule of law and promoted equality between all races, colours and ethnicities. Today's Muslims are making history, too. But, it is the history of decadence, defeats and enemy occupation. Why such an awful contrast between two brands of the people who claim to be the believers of the same Creator, the same prophet (peace be upon him) and the same Qur'an? The failures of today's Muslims do not owe to any climate or environmental change or any disaster. It is due to their full blown betrayal of the objective of the creation. They also made the ugliest betrayal of the highest blessing of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la -the holy Qur'an by ignoring its teachings. The path they follow in politics, statecraft, warfare, culture, judiciary, education is far away from the Qur'anic roadmap; and rather mimic that of the kuffars. (Note: the term kafir and kuffar are the vocabularies used by Allah Sub'hana Ta'la again and again in the holy Qur'an to describe the deniers and the enemies of Islam, hence these jargons are used in this article to align with this Divine description). Such betrayals of the objective and such deviation from the straight path ( sirataul mustaqeem) are indeed the gravest crimes against the All-Powerful Creator. Other crimes are indeed the offshoots of these major crimes.

Humans are created not for the sake of creation. The Almighty Lord has His specific agenda in raising this best and the most intelligent creation on earth. All the Divine Books and the prophets are very explicit on it. Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la's narrative on His objective comes as follows: "And I did not create the jinn and the mankind except that they should do ibadah unto me."-(Surah adh-Dhariyat, verse 56). It is indeed the most pivotal revelation from Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. It prefixes the role of every man and woman in every arena on earth. It gives an unequivocal signal to every human that he must set his own agenda only to fulfil the agenda of his Supreme Lord. Such congruence of his own objective with the objective of his Almighty Lord is vital for his success both in this world and in the hereafter. This is the only way to save one's life from the hellfire. It is so important that thousands of messengers were sent and the Divine Books are revealed to help people understand this most crucial issue in life. Nothing is more important in education, culture, politics or spirituality of people than understanding this revealed agenda of the Almighty Lord. Hence, the greatest crime of the kuffar occupation is not its economic exploitation, subjugation or oppression, but driving people away from the assigned agenda of the survival and forcing on them a project that takes them to the hellfire. This is indeed the greatest crime of a non-Islamic state. The kuffar colonial occupation has ended, but the secularist occupation all over the Muslim World is committing the same crime by continuation of the same colonial legacy.

In the above verse, Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la didn't assign any religious rituals like five times prayer, month long fasting, haj or charity as the prime agenda of life. It is ibadah; hence the verb "le'yabudun" has been used. The word ibadah isn't mere worship in the form of some rituals; it has much deeper and wider connotation. At the time of revelation of the holy Qur'an, the terms ibadah, abd or ubudiah were not unknown in the contemporary Arabic language; hence the meanings must be understood how they were used and understood by the contemporary Arabs. The word abd means slave; and ibadah or ubudiah mean slavery. Hence the word ibadah gives a defining role to every man. It is indeed a way of life that gives a sense of complete servitude to the Supreme Master. In those days, ibadah or slavery was not a part-time role of a slave; nor was any duty confined within a certain premise with specific job description. It was indeed an all-time lifelong assignment.

The most catastrophic ignorance of the humans is not the ignorance of science and technology, nor even illiteracy. It is indeed the knowledge of his Creator's objective vis-a-vis his creation. The greatest wisdom in human life indeed builds up on this knowledge. Ignorance on science or technology will not harm anyone in the hereafter; but ignorance of his Lord's objective regarding his creation will definitely take him to the hellfire. Because, such ignorance leads him to live a life totally incongruent with his Lord's objective. How can one make any action plan for his life with such ignorance? A man exhibits his greatest ignorance and commits the greatest sin by committing betrayal of the Divine objective. Such betrayal is indeed the ugliest and the most fundamental crime of every kafir; it breeds numerous other crimes, too. Then, all of his wealth, abilities and talent become tools for doing more crimes on earth and make him fit only for the hellfire. So, Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la says, "It is the kuffar (the disbelievers) who are the zalim (wrongdoers)"-(Surah al-Baqara, verse 254).

In the early days of Islam, the Muslims didn't have any college or university, but could successfully eradicate such ignorance from Muslims' mind. That worked as a master key to open the door of success both here and the hereafter. Such knowledge prompted them to invest their wealth and ability -even life, in the fulfilment of the Divine objective.

A Muslim's slavery

A true Muslim is known for his slavery (ubudiah) for Almighty Allah Sub'hana wa T'ala. A kafir is known for his rebellion. Here, the rebellion is against Almighty Allah's prescribed code of life. Hence, to understand Islam one needs to understand slavery in the context of the contemporary Arabs who practised it while the holy Qur'an was being revealed to them. Since the Arab men and women were familiar with the norm of slavery, they didn't find any difficulty to understand the implication of the Qur'anic vocabularies like ibadah, a'bed and ubudiah. In those days, a slave didn't possess any right to have his own wish or agenda; used to be an exclusive tool of his master to execute his agenda. In slavery, slave's own life and family stay irrelevant, he lives a life only to please his master. He had to take his master's friend as his own friend and his enemy as his own enemy. He had to fight a war and sacrifice his life only for his master's cause. The master possessed the right to punish and even kill his slaves without any accountability to anyone.

Islam abolished slavery of a man for another; but established slavery as ibadah exclusively for Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'al. Those who accept such slavery (ubudiah) are called Muslim. In those days, one could buy slaves by paying money only to the slave-owner. The slaves didn't receive any share in the transaction; and never considered a beneficiary of the deal. Like a commodity, used to be handed over from one owner to another. But, Islam introduced new ethics of universal equality; made all men and women the equal slave of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. Hence, none was made owner of another. The Almighty Lord makes the direct transaction with His slaves, hence becomes the beneficiary of the deal. For a role as a faithful and humble slave of the Almighty, a Muslim gets a place in the paradise for an infinite life. It is the greatest deal that a man can think of. No one can buy it; and gains only as a reward. The whole earth full of gold can't match its worth -as revealed in the holy Qur'an: "Surely, those who disbelieve and die while they are unbelievers, the earth full of gold shall not be accepted from one of them, even if he offer to ransom himself with it. -(Sura al-Imran, verse 91).

The Qur'anic text of the ground-breaking transaction between a believer and his Lord comes in surah at-Taubah, in verse 111. As per transaction, a believer needs to perform his role to get the promised reward from Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. The rule of engagement is made clear and simple. More a believer invests in His way, more he receives as the reward. He receives the highest rank as a martyr if sacrifices his life in His Cause; and the victory comes to such believers as a bye-product. Today, such slavery for Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la seldom exists in Muslims' life. Rather, they show rebellion against Him. And the old form of slavery has returned in a new form with new masters. They have turned slaves of their own whims. The absence of sharia, hudud, khelafa, shura, the Muslim unity and jihad in Muslim country tells a lot about such rebellion. Instead, they show full alignment with the kuffars. The corruptive state and its institutions, the riba-based banking, the non-sharia laws, the prostitution as legalised trade and the coalition with the kuffar in war against Islam are indeed the markers of such alignment. They recite the Divine law (sharia), but these laws have no place in their daily life. Thus, they stand distinctively different from the early Muslims; and follow a path altogether different from them.

A man needs Divine blessing for his ultimate success. But to qualify for such blessing, one needs to follow the revealed roadmap in every step of his life and avoid every deviation. A Muslim -like the early Muslims, must excel in his compliance. And it needs to be holistic. Hence a Muslim must not limit his religious practices within the religious rituals like five times prayer, month-long fasting in Ramadan, haj and charity. His politics, education, culture, law, judiciary, warfare and all other segments of life too, must fall in line with the Qur'anic guidance. It is indeed the believers' slavery. But today, the Muslims made history in deviation. Instead of compliance with the holy Qur'an, they show sheer rebellion. They are more focused on worldly gains and stand far away from the Quranic straight path.

A class of neo-donkeys

Today, the Muslims are known for failures in almost all fields. Whereas, they are given the roadmap for sure success. They are also given the largest treasure of unearned wealth on earth that worth hundreds of trillions of dollars. These are the oil, gas, solar energy and other resources. The Muslims didn't invest even a single day or the slightest effort to produce such huge asset. But today, the Muslims terribly failed to draw any benefit from such enormous Divine gift. They still stand as the most defenceless, the most defeated and the most humiliated people on earth. Their countries are occupied, the cities are bombed to rubbles, millions of Muslim men and women and children are either killed or stay evicted from their homes and now wander as the vagabond refugees in the streets of foreign lands! Their failure can only be compared with that of the people of Israel. The unearned wealth of the Muslims can be compared with manna and sal'wa -the unearned food staff that came down from the sky to feed several hundred thousands of the Israeli people during their 40 years' stay in the desert of Sinai Peninsula where they had nothing to eat and drink. But such blessing didn't help the people of Israeli tribes to enhance their servitude or gratitude to Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la; rather increased their deviation, greed and arrogance. Their deviation from the Divine Truth went so far that they started worshipping a self-made statue of a cow -while they were still surviving on manna and salwa from the sky. Today, the failure of the Muslims to use the unearned wealth for moral, educational, spiritual and economic wellbeing of the people is also catastrophic. It is very calamitous that they fail even in using the legal (sharia) and the punitive (hudud) prescription of Almighty Allah -as revealed in the holy Qur'an.

The sharia law and hudud are not the simple gifts of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'ala. These are indeed the greatest blessings of the Almighty Allah for the mankind. Sharia was given to the great prophet Musa (peace be upon him) in Torah. Another great messenger Prophet Isa (peace be upon him) also came to the world to revive the same sharia that was revealed to Prophet Musa (peace be upon him). But both the Jews and Christians have fully ignored the teachings of these two great prophets; as a result, the sharia law revealed in Torah stay fully abandoned. The sharia and hudud were finally revealed to the last prophet of Islam Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the holy Qur'an. Such laws are more important than any foods, drinks or any other material endowments. Foods and drinks are given even to the animals. But that do not add any civility and moral highness to the animals. Many of the kuffars also receive a lot of foods, drinks and material endowments. But that do not help them either.

Law of a country is the most authentic marker of wisdom, sagacity and moral highness of a people; not any tower, pyramid, or scientific achievement. Even the worst people on earth could achieve a lot of wonders in the past. In the court of Almighty Allah, these will have no value. The people who are morally low and indulge in racism, nationalism, colonialism, imperialism, fascism, paganism and other wickedness are exactly known by their immoral laws. All kuffars indeed showed such moral, spiritual and conceptual disabilities in all ages. So, they could convict the greatest people of the history like Prophet Ibrahim (peace be upon him), Prophet Musa (peace be upon him), Prophet Isa (peace be upon him), Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and many others as criminal; and did everything to kill them. Those old kuffars died; but their legacy still thrives. So, the enmity against Islam's roadmap still continues. This is why, the self-sacrificing Islamists who fight against the enemy occupation and for implementation of sharia get killed as terrorist. And the enemy occupation get eulogised as liberation -as happened with the US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Such moral sickness is so global that even the brutal occupation by the imperialists get endorsed by the UN. Therefore, when the British Army occupied Palestine and Iraq in 1917, and the French Army occupied Syria in 1922, such colonial occupations were given the legal mandate by the League of Nations -the fore-runner of the UN. Following the footsteps of the imperialists, the Israeli terrorists, too, used terrorism as a tool for illegal state building. They occupied Palestine, evicted its original people from their homes and established Israel as an apartheid state only for the Jews. Since the UN itself stands under the occupation of the imperialists, such a criminal act of occupation never got condemned in its forum. Rather, Israel was given the quick recognition as a legal state.

Islam's highest glory doesn't lie in mosques, minarets or other artefacts. The real perfection and strength of Islam lie in its sharia and hudud. Because, these are not any human inventions, rather directly come from Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. This is why, Islam's every law and punitive prescription reflects the greatest wisdom of the Most Wise -Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. It works as a tool to enforce the Divine justice on earth and eradicate the crimes. It is indeed the humanising arm of Islam. Hence, without implementing sharia, Islam can't deliver its benefit to the mankind. The Muslim Ummah does not run any shortage of people who perform the religious rituals -more than a billion do that regularly all over the world. But that rituals didn't add any glory to Islam and the Muslims. The Muslims can stand as the best people on earth only because of enjoining the good deeds (a'maru bil maruf) and eradicating the crimes (nehi anil munkar) -as indicated in sura al-Imran, verse 110. For that, it needs the full enforcement of the Divine instrument called sharia. The state that implements sharia becomes the safest haven on earth -as happened in the early days of Islam. Therefore, those who stand against sharia, they indeed stand against Allah -the Almighty. It is a rebellious move to look for peace and success without the Qur'anic roadmap. On such pretext, these rebels launch a criminal war to dismantle the most crucial civilizational instrument of Islam. Because of them, the Muslims now terribly suffer from an ongoing huge internal war. This way, they could contribute more speed to the continuing downfall. This is why, in the golden days of Islam, such ruthless enemies of Islam used to get capital punishment for their heinous crime.

Allah -the All-Knower never overlooks the crimes of these monstrous enemies of Islam. So, in the holy Qur'na He depicts these enemies in real colours. Those who do not run the judiciary according to the revealed sharia and do not apply hudud on the convicts are branded as kafir, zalim and fasiq.-(Sura Maidah, verse 44, 45 and 47). Five times prayer, month-long fasting, haj and charity of these criminals can't undo such labelling. Awfully, these are the people who currently run the Muslim countries. As a result, the Muslims are deprived of the blessing of sharia law and hudud. It is the greatest deprivation of the Muslims; it is indeed the utter deprivation of guidance. Satan and his followers can easily claim leadership of these ideologically lost and confounded people. Which is why, even the infidels and evil ideologies get millions of followers in the Muslim countries. With such deprivation of moral guidance, how the Muslims can move forward in the right direction? Therefore, like a blind man, they fall again and again in the same hole.

A donkey -like any other animal, can't understand the worth and importance of sharia- the highest gift of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. Nor is it capable of showing any interest to implement it -although it can carry a holy Book day and night for years on its back. The people of Israel didn't show any better sense towards sharia and other Divine guidance either. They were given sharia in Taurat. They could carry it as book, too; but they failed to understand its worth and importance. As a result, they didn't show any interest to implement it. For such a sheer lack of sense and responsibility, Allah Sub'hana wa Tala made a comparison of these people of Israel with an animal like donkey. It is revealed, "The likeness of those who were entrusted with the Taurat, then they do did not take it on is like that of a donkey who carries (volumes of) books. Wretched is the example of the people who deny the signs of Allah. And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." -(Surah al-Jummah, verse 5). The unearned manna and salwa that they received in Sinai Peninsula for years couldn't help them take the guidance, rather increased their greed and cowardice.

Sharia can't be implemented in any land that stands occupied under the enemies. The enemy occupation needs to be dismantled. For that, it needs jihad against the enemies and the sacrifice of lives and wealth -as was the case with the prophet of Islam and his companions. Because of withdrawal from jihad, their land remained occupied by the enemies and the sharia revealed in Taurat didn't get any chance for the implementation. It was indeed one of the ugliest betrayals of an assigned mission; and invited the Divine punishment. They had to roam as refugees in the cities and villages of various countries in Asia, Africa and Europe. During their stay in Arabia, they also showed their deadly enmity against Islam. They even aligned with the pagan infidels to dismantle the only sharia-state at its nascent stage in Medina. Awfully, the Muslims, today, are going down the same route. They recite Qur'an, but do not bother to understand it. Nor do they bother to abide by it. They are showing the same incompetence to understand the worth and importance of sharia. Like any kuffar, they too, stand firmly against the implementation of sharia in any Muslim land. They also show full alliance with the global coalition of the kuffars to dismantle any sharia-compliant state in any part of the World. They look like a class of neo-donkeys in the modern world. So the Christians, the Jews and the Hindus are not alone in their fight against Islam and the Muslims, the new generation of donkeys have joined their rank too. Before the colonial occupation of the kuffars, it was unimaginable that the Muslims will run the judiciary according to laws that are incompatible to sharia. In those days, the Muslims didn't know any other law apart from sharia. Now, it is exactly the opposite. As an ummah, they also move to the opposite direction: the direction of defeat, decadence and humiliation.

The deprivation of the religious right

It is an extreme tyranny that the Muslims are deprived of the religious right even in the Muslim lands. It is the worst calamities of occupation by the secularist enemies of Islam. In the early days of Islam, the Muslims had to engage in bloody jihad to get their religious right from the kuffar occupiers. But now the so-called Muslim states under the so-called Muslim rulers do not provide any peaceful option to enjoy such right either. The Muslims fight wars, sacrifice live and build states -not only for the voting rights, civic liberty and other worldly gains. These are not the distinctive specifics of a Muslim state. Even in kuffar states, one can enjoy plenty of such rights. The religious right of a Muslim doesn't entail only the right of religious rituals; it is much more than that. It is the full freedom to perform the full slavery to their Supreme Lord Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'ala -the sole reason for creation of the mankind. Such slavery to the Almighty Lord includes the full practice of His revealed law (sharia), hudud, shura, khelafa, jihad, Muslim unity and other obligatory Islamic fundamentals. The right to perform these Islamic obligation is million times more important than other civic rights. Voting rights, economic rights or cultural rights wouldn't save humans from the hellfire. In absence of his full slavery to Almighty Allah, a Muslim runs the real risk of entering into hellfire -the holy Qur'an is very explicit on that. But how can a Muslim perform the full slavery to his Supreme Lord when he is not allowed to practise His revealed sharia and can't dismantle the divisive walls in the Muslim World? How can he claim to be full Muslim when he can't establish khilafa and can't do jihad in His way? Compliance with a non-sharia state is indeed a clear marker of deficiency in faith and gross deviation from the Qur'anic straight path. Such deviation can only add more speed to the Muslims' ongoing downfall; and bring more disgrace both here and in the hereafter. Those who really worried about life in the hereafter, how they could be oblivious or callous about this serious issue?

In the days of rightly guided Caliphs, there was no electoral process like today; but the people enjoyed the full civic liberty as well as the religious right to practise full slavery to Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. Hence they could give birth to the best civilisation on earth. Now in most of the Muslim countries, one can practise adultery, gambling, obscenity, riba and other evils but can't be full Muslim! Annihilation of slavery to one Almighty Allah -as is the norm in kuffar and secularist occupation, opens the flash gates of slavery to other extreme evil forces. In the Muslim World, thus emerged the satanic rule of tyrannical despots. It is an irony that the Muslims show more submission to these criminal despots than to the laws of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. The voting rights of the common people now proved to be a mere facade for more sinister agenda of the evil forces. So the established liars, killers, robbers, rapists, fraudsters, and manipulators enjoy a free rein to bully and bluff the people for easy electoral victory. An honest and propaganda-shy man can't compete these devils. Hence, people like Adolf Hitler, Norendro Modi, Donald Trump and many other evil-mongers could easily use the electoral process as a ladder to grab the topmost post. In India, the voting rights couldn't protect even the survival rights of the minorities. The Muslims get beaten to death even on the suspicion of eating beef -as happened to many Indian Muslim men and women. The democratically elected governments, the party cadres and the law-enforcing agencies jointly take part in genocidal massacre against the minorities. It happened against the Muslims hundreds of times -more despicably in Gujrat (in 2002), Bombay (in 1992-93), and Muzaffarnagar (in 2013). Such massacres also took place against the Sikh in Delhi (in 1984) and against the Christians (in 2008) in many Indian provinces.

It is an irony that the disease in not confined within the enemies. It has also badly affected the people who believe in Islam and perform religious rituals. The symptoms appear through the wrong setting of their priorities. Even many pro-Islamic parties and their leaders are focussed more on achieving the voting and civic rights; and give little importance to getting the full religious rights. As if, getting a Muslim elected as the President of the country or becoming a minister or an MP is a great victory for Islam. It has proved to be a great distraction from the real Islamisation methodology -as prescribed in the holy Qur'an and practised by the prophet of Islam (peace be upon him) and the early Muslims. This is why, elections in Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and many other Muslim countries and the participation of the so-called Islamic parties didn't help getting the basic religious rights for practising the full slavery of Allah Sub'hana wa Ta'la. Because of the failed strategy, the Islamic parties couldn't show any success to take politics, judiciary, administration, education and culture onto the Qur'nic roadmap. Therefore, even repeated exercise of voting rights do not fulfil the core purpose of survival of a man on earth; rather strengthen and legitimise the secularists' occupation. Under such occupation, the whole state infrastructure does everything to take people to the hellfire. What else could be worst catastrophe for humans than such evil occupation? More awfully, such occupation now survives in a Muslim country through Muslim vote, Muslim taxpayers' money and Muslim manpower!

2017-01-29 Sun 20:13:58 ct