Jamada al-Thani 16,1427/July 12, 2006 #44
July 12, 2006. ISRAELI TANK COLUMNS are rolling into Lebanon.
Israeli air striikes have destroyed 5 bridges. Israel is
threatening to take Lebanon 'twenty years back.' As we go the
press, Israelis dropped bombs near Beirut. See press releases below.
"thousands of Kashmiri women raped by Indian troops"
The underlined word is the correct word. It could not be corrected
before New Trend #43 was sent to the first 1,000 readers. The rest
of the list got the corrected version. Our apologies.
Please note that the word Hadith is used as a singular noun
in Arabic and plural noun is Ahadith (or Ahaadeeth).
Jamaat al-Muslimeen News
P.O. Box 10881
Baltimore, MD 21234
U.S. Muslims Condemn Israeli Aggression Against Lebanon:
Free ALL Palestinian & Lebanese Prisoners!
July 12: Following a border clash in which an Israeli terror
group, IDF,'s unit was routed by Hezbollah, Israeli terrorist
tank forces crossed into southern Lebanon. In the initial
battle, 3 Israeli terror troops were killed and 2 captured
by Hezbollah. The Islamic forces want to exchange the captured
Israeli terrorists for the Lebanese prisoners who have been in
the prisons of the Jewish terror entity known as Israel
for several years.
As the Israeli tanks crossed the international frontier, the
first tank was blown up by Hezbollah, killing another 4
Israeli terrorist troops.
Israel is in occupation of Lebanese territory and is now
threatening to terrorize all of Lebanon. The Lebanese
ambassador to the U.S. said [CNN July 12] that Israel should
negotiate to bring about a prisoner exchange but the
ambassador of the terrorist entity refused the offer, depending
on the tremendous fire power supplied to the terrorists by the
U.S. to cow down the people of Lebanon.
The Muslims of America urge the U.S. to call off its Jewish
attack dog. There is absolutely no reason why the U.S.
should continue to support a terrorist entity.
Press Release #2
Israeli Terror Attacks Kill 14 more Palestinians,
Including NINE Children.
Jamaat Condemns Atrocities and calls for Worldwide
Israel related Business.
July 12: The latest Israeli air attack on Gaza killed 14
more Palestinians, bringing the total killed in the latest
aggression to 74. Those killed in the Israeli terror group's
air strike include 9 children.
Jamaat notices that these acts, committed by an entity which
has a seat in the United Nations and has the full support of
the Bush administration, are crimes against humanity.
The Islamic forces in Palestine, following Jewish law itself,
as well as Islamic law, should bring the Israeli Jews to
trial and execute 71 of them to equalize the score.
Jamaat al-Muslimeen calls for a worldwide boycott of
Jewish businesses which support Israel as well as businesses
which support Israel. Remember that Nestle has 50% Israeli
share and one of its facilities is located on usurped
Ashqar: A Friend of the U.S.: Hounded by Israel,
accused of Funding his People: Went on hunger Strike
to protest Violation of Rights
[New Trend's apologies for the language used by a
non-Muslim reporter about an innocent man.]
July 6, 2006
BY NATASHA KORECKI Federal Courts Reporter
As he faces trial this year, terror funding suspect
Abdelhaleem Ashqar has dropped one high-profile lawyer
for another. And his new lawyer won an acquittal in a
similar case in Florida.
U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve on Wednesday allowed
Ashqar, of Alexandria, Va., to have attorney William
Moffitt lead his case after Moffitt promised he could
still be prepared for an October trial.
Moffitt late last year won an acquittal in the highly
publicized trial of former University of South Florida
Professor Sami Al-Arian. It was among the most high-profile
terrorism trials held in U.S. courts since the Sept. 11,
2001, terrorist attacks.
In that trial, Moffitt, a Washington, D.C., lawyer, put on
no defense witnesses. Al-Arian was accused in a conspiracy
tied to raising money for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. He
later pleaded to lesser charges.
Ashqar, accused of helping fund Hamas, is dropping Chicago
lawyer Tom Durkin, who represents Daley patronage chief
Robert Sorich and white supremacist Matt Hale. Durkin
asked to withdraw.
Claims charges are political
"I just want out," Durkin told St. Eve at a court hearing Wednesday.
Ashqar is known for staging a nearly two-month hunger strike
while in prison here, and in 2004, he ran to replace Yasser
Arafat as the next Palestinian leader.
Ashqar is accused along with Muhammad Salah of Bridgeview
and Mousa Abu Marzook, a fugitive believed to be living in
Syria, of engaging in a 15-year racketeering conspiracy to
fund Hamas by opening domestic bank accounts and laundering
millions of dollars. Ashqar has always characterized the
charges against him as political.
Viewpoint: Jewish-Black Relations
Horowitz's Lies about the Black Panther Party and the Nation of Islam
by Kurt Maynard
[Special to New Trend.] [Edited for length]
David Horowitz's autobiography Radical Son
In one exchange between Newton and Horowitz, the author suggests that he felt
morally obligated to correct an erroneous belief that had developed in the
Panther party; yep, you guessed it, anti-Semitism. According to Horowitz, some
Panther's had come to accept this racist idea because of Stokely Carmichael
and his less than revolutionary belief that Jews within the movement were acting
as a Fifth Column and weren't particularly interested in the black cause;
sound familiar? Of course Horowitz carefully sets up his narrative in such a way
that the naive reader will reject the possibility that what Carmichael believed
might have had some basis in reality; Horowitz does this by admission and denial,
a common tactic employed in kosher revisionism. According to Horowitz, after
a time he felt honored to be thought of as an equal by Newton and for that
reason he was "emboldened" to speak his mind:
"Talking to Huey as a kind of equal emboldened me to raise yet another
difficult issue. A strain of anti-Semitism had developed in the Party
during the years he [Newton] was in prison. Of course, the Panthers
were not alone among black radicals in their attacks on Jews. In
1966, Stokely Carmichael (Kwame Ture) and the leaders of the SNCC
had expelled whites from the civil rights organization, accusing them
of being a fifth column inside the movement. Since Jews were a near
majority of the whites in these organizations, and had played a
strategic role in organizing and funding the struggle, it was clear
to everyone that they were the primary target of the assault. This
was underscored by the support that Carmichael and the black left
gave to the Arab states during their 1967 attack on Israel."
In the above paragraph Horowitz absolutely reveals himself to be the liar he
is, but it goes unnoticed by the vast majority of readers because most people
aren't aware of the fact that Israel preemptively attacked the Arab states on
June 5, 1967, not the other way around. This is what I would refer to as
kosher revisionism, and it is quite common in the world today. As a matter
a fact, it's the norm. Historical revisionism has developed a bad name
primarily because kosher revisionism rules the airwaves, radio and television;
ethnic Jews have a near monopoly on the media in all its forms, and for that
reason, lies like Horowitz's go unnoticed by most people. Horowitz predictably
sets up his "admission," i.e. that Jews were disproportionately represented
in the black civil rights movement by first prostrating himself in such a way as
to fool the reader into believing that he, Horowitz, was only able to influence
Newton, because Newton, the black man in the relationship, felt that Horowitz
was an equal. Many people will laugh at the very idea that a Jew would consider
any black to be an equal. As a rule, Jews loathe blacks more than they do
whites, but they find that exploiting blacks is advantageous to the advancement
of their agenda, and it is for this reason, and no other, that they associate
with blacks. Many blacks know this; perhaps that is why the unapologetic and
openly pro-white Larry Darby polled as many black votes as he did in the recent
June 5, 2006 democratic primary election for Alabama Attorney General; because
he is vociferously critical of organized Jewry. An excellent book on the reality
of the Jewish/Black relationship is The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and
Jews, put out by the Nation of Islam, a group Horowitz absolutely despises as
shown by the fact that he allegedly considered the Nation to be more violent
than the Black Panthers, a total joke really, and one that no knowledgeable
person could possibly accept. Horowitz again "creates" this impossibility
by revealing that he promised a property owner that a building the owner was to
sell to the Black Panthers wouldn't be used by any violent black groups
like the Nation of Islam.
In this case, Horowitz kosher revisionism borders on the absurd, yet
most readers won't pick it up, again because the predominantly
Jewish media has so effectively smeared the Nation of Islam, that
most Americans know very little about them, other than they are
supposedly anti-Semitic and violent. The truth is that the Nation
understands the nature of the Zionist and hasn't shied away from
talking about them, or documenting factual stories that relate the
actual relationship that Jews have with blacks; which is now and
has always been exploitative. In this vein, Horowitz again attempts
to create a sympathetic response from the reader by alluding to the
idea that he, and Jews in general, were actually the ones that had
been exploited by the Panthers. He again divulges important
admissions in respect to Jews and the civil rights movement, and
then denies that these Jews were motivated by anything but altruism
and again he endeavors to reinforce his earlier lie at the expense
of the Arabs:
"I began to review events of the past to which I had paid little attention
before, like the expulsion of the Jews from the civil rights movement in 1966.
Jews had funded the movement, devised its legal strategies, and provided support
for its efforts in the media and in the universities â€“ and wherever else they
had power. More than half the freedom riders who had gone to the southern states
were Jews, although Jews constituted only 3% of the population. It was an
unprecedented show of solidarity from one people to another. Jews had put their
resources and lives on the line to support the black struggle for civil rights,
and indeed two of their sons, Schwerner and Goodman, had been murdered for
their efforts. But even while these tragic events were still fresh, the black
leaders of the movement had unceremoniously expelled the Jews from their ranks.
When Israel was attacked in 1967 by a coalition of Arab states calling for its
annihilation, the same black leaders threw their support to the Arab aggressors,
denouncing Zionism as racism."
Here again Horowitz reveals what a propagandist he is, as mentioned previously
the Israelis preemptively attacked the Arab states in 1967, not the other way
around. Thus in no sense could the Arabs be considered "aggressors." Once
again Horowitz admits to the fact that Jews were disproportionately represented
in the black civil rights movement, a fact that many liberal college professors
are still afraid to acknowledge to this day. Earlier Horowitz attempted to
convince the reader that he felt honored to be thought of as an equal by Huey
Newton, but in the above paragraph he reveals something he had carefully hidden
up to this point in his biography and that is the fact that Jews single handedly
funded the black civil rights movement, that they essentially developed all its
strategies and that they utilized their media to advance its causes, ideas that
organized Jewry has collectively denied for more than forty years. Now I ask the
reader - does this sound like a relationship founded on the concept of equality?
The truth is Horowitz was never a Marxist, a socialist or otherwise, except in
name, and only where it might have been beneficial to Jewish Supremacism.
Horowitz clearly reveals this when he classifies Natan Sharansky as a persecuted
rather than what Sharansky really is, a fanatical Zionist, hater of
Gentiles, purveyor of holocaust lies, and Israeli Cultural Minister.
No doubt Horowitz's attempts to delude certain Pantherss in the 1970s
wasn't entirely successful That is why he focused on the corrupt drug
addict Huey Newton, who he knew was weak and would be willing to
compromise in all the necessary ways.
One last telling example of Horowitz's Zionist, rather than socialist
leanings, is his insistence that Huey allow him to write a "position paper"
for the Black Panther party on the Arab/Israeli relationship, which only
reinforces the fact that Horowitz, even in the early 1970s, was focused on
issues that were good for Jews, rather than what would advance the allegedly
revolutionary plans of the Black Panthers and the Black civil-rights
movement. Horowitz wasn't stupid however; he knew he had to dress up his
propaganda in such a way as not to give away what his intentions really were, so
he employed his considerable writing skills and inserted the following rhetoric
in the paper:
"Though the ultimate survival of Jews and Palestinians, as of all peoples,
depends on the revolutionary overthrow of world imperialism and Capitalism."
Although in the 1970s this wasn't a strange position for a supposed liberal
and revolutionary to take, it is ironic that today Horowitz is a vociferous
defender of both, at least when it concerns the racist state of Israel and its
imperialist expansionism. In the end, Horowitz's relationship with Huey Newton
was based upon mutual need; Newton was never ideologically motivated. He
bathed in the persona of a revolutionary and Horowitz was a Zionist
propagandist that played the role of a concerned Jewish liberal, and
who required a front man and found it in Huey Newton.
CENSORSHIP in MUSLIM COMMUNITIES/MASJIDS
[Re: Our Report on Allentown, PA's police state type of Islamic Center]
As Salaamu Alaikum Editor of New Trend and community,
I have been quiet for a while due to personal reasons. I see
a trend that we must stop in our communities. The official
and unofficial banning of news sources, organizations and
individuals in our communities. Most of the time this is done
simply due to someone saying something that another finds
offensive. There are ways to deal with offensiveness from
anyone. Question the source (using Quran and Sunnah) present
our evidence and if you feel someone has said something out
of malice then take the appropriate action and call them to account.
As a community we must learn to be able to look pass any comments
made by anyone we may not like for valid or invalid reasons and
address any news source,organizations and individuals if we feel
a statement has been made that needs correction. We must stop
the official and unofficial censoring of news sources,
organizations and individuals due to our differences with
views about any particular, issue, leader or leadership. Our
leadership (local and national) must be big enough to take
criticism and move forward. Allah knows our true intention
and hearts. If we know our intention is pure it does not
matter what anyone else has to say.
We continue to buy and read newspapers published in our cities
that harshly and unjustly criticize our community. However
when we disagree among each other we often times can not put
the criticism in its proper perspective or treat it as we
should without the official and unofficial banning of people
and organizations. As we continue to allow this to happen we
miss out on being able to get valuable information needed by
many in our communities.
It is time for us to grow up as a community and learn how to
take the good out of any source and leave that which we think
is not good in the hands of Allah. We do not have many news
sources in our community and we cannot afford to ban any of
the ones we have at this time. Call the editors/publishers to
account if you must however do not ban. Do not deny people the
right to read and think for themselves.
Critical thinking and self-examination is something we must learn
to do in order to be able to survive as individuals and as a
community. If we can not look at ourselves with a critical eye
we will not be strong enough to make the corrections necessary
to strengthen ourselves as individuals and as a community. We
will not be able to move forward in an effective manner. Remember
this race that we are in at this time is it about the propagation
of Islam not our own selfish desires.
Every time we attempt to deny Islamic sources of information to be
distributed in our community we are in essence attempting to play
God. People are smart and know how to read between the lines. Most
people will question what they read and act accordingly. We no
longer need any leaders attempting to protect us by shielding
us from sources that may make comments that are unfavorable to
them (valid or invalid). When this censorship is done we miss
out on very valuable information needed for us to make informed
decisions in our personal and communal lives.
We are intelligent enough to think for ourselves. We do not need
anyone spoon feeding us on any level.
Individuals, organizations and news sources must begin to speak
loudly about the banning of any source of information in our
communities. If someone has said or done something that needs
correcting then follow Quran and Sunnah and correct the party
or parties involved.
I personally do not need any self proclaimed leader(s) on any
level attempting to think for me. I am adult enough and I know
many others who are adult enough to read material, analyze it,
questioned it and move forward without the help of anyone that
we do not ask to assist us.
Muslim Women's Political Action Committee
2006-07-12 Wed 19:51:24 cdt